Skip to main content

Political Funding Reform Pointless, BN Disrespects Democratic Principles

Speakers at a forum last night listed down reasons why Putrajaya's attempts at political funding reform will not be effective, and these lie in the fact that the ruling Barisan Nasional (BN) lacks certain basic democratic ideals.

A big set back is the practice of patronage which drive politicians to seek money at the risk of compromising principles, said PKR's Kelana Jaya MP Wong Chen.

Other examples of BN's lack of respect for democracy included discrimination in the disbursal of federal funds for opposition-held constituencies and use of government machinery during election campaigns, said PAS's Shah Alam MP Khalid Samad.

Both were speakers at a forum titled, “Political Funding or Corruption: The RM2.6 billion Question” in Petaling Jaya last night, as the government starts work on a political funding reform plan following a fund transfer scandal that involved Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak.

Khalid, of PAS, said the clearest signs of how the BN does not respect democratic ideals compared with political parties in Western countries, was how the federal government discriminates between BN and opposition MPs when giving out development funds.

BN MPs get about RM1 million a year to carry out programmes for their constituencies.

For opposition MPs, no funds are given directly for any programme. Instead, the taxpayers money is funnelled through a special government agency which can only be accessed by Umno division chiefs in the opposition constituency, he said.

“BN does not respect that people have the right to choose their government and they don’t respect the people’s choice,” said Khalid.

PAS's Shah Alam MP Khalid Samad laments the sad state of democracy iin the country, saying how in developed nations a $5,000 donation can lead to the downfall of a politician to quit while the prime minister in Malaysia remains despite receiving RM2.6 billion into his personal account. PAS's Shah Alam MP Khalid Samad laments the sad state of democracy in the country, saying how in developed nations a $5,000 donation can lead to the downfall of a politician to quit while the prime minister in Malaysia remains despite receiving RM2.6 billion into his personal account.

BN MPs will also use their government positions to stay in power, such as how there is no caretaker government during an election besides the use of government vehicles, agencies and public funds during election campaigns.

“In Western countries, politicians from all parties believe in proper democratic practices, which includes not abusing your position. So, for example, when a politician receives even 5,000 dollars, he is forced to resign.

"In Malaysia, Najib gets RM2.6 billion in his personal accounts and he still remains in power despite the suspicious circumstances behind the transfer of such a large amount to his personal account," Khalid said.

More from The Malaysian Insider
-The Office of MP for Shah Alam-

Comments

Izuddin said…
When one speak of toppling a government, it doesnt means removing the PM or the cabinet ministers. Topping a government means resurrecting a new system totally.

Napoleon toppled the french monarcgy and installed a french republic.

Bersih is not going to throw away democratic system in Malaysia or intoduce a new system. Bersih only wants Najib removed.
All party should declare their source of financing
..? What would happen if there is foreign fund making a sponsorship with political interest...?

Popular posts from this blog

Kerana Tidak Istiqamah Maka Akhirnya Terpinggir

Keputusan PRU14 sekarang telah diketahui umum. Pakatan Harapan (PH) berjaya mengambil alih Putrajaya dan negeri-negeri di seluruh Negara kecuali Perlis, Pahang dan Sarawak yang kekal bawah BN sambil Kelantan dan Terengganu jatuh pada PAS.

Walaupun akan ada yang berkata bahawa PAS telah berjaya dengan keputusan anatara yang paling cemerlang dalam sejarahnya, hakikatnya ianya sebenarnya boleh jauh lebih baik dari itu. Malangnya, sifat gopoh dan kurang yakin kepada pendekatan yang diikutinya sejak zaman reformasi telah menyebabkan PAS semakin terpinggir dari arus perdana politik negara. Ia kembali sebagai parti pantai timur dan kawasan kampung Melayu setelah beraksi cergas di pantai barat dan kawasan bandar pada tahun-tahun pasca reformasi. Cogan kata “PAS for all” kian tidak kedengaran dan PAS kembali sebagai parti bersifat eksklusif memperjuangkan agenda khas bagi masyarakat Muslim dan Melayu.

Dakwaan Kosong Hj Hadi: Antara Kebenaran dan Khayalan

Pada 14hb April Hj. Hadi membuat satu 'pendedahan' mengenai sebab sebenar AMANAH ditolak. Kononnya ianya adalah kerana pimpinan AMANAH semasa menjawat jawatan dalam PAS ingin meminda perlembagaan PAS sehingga dikurangkan kuasa Majlis Syura Ulama. Tuduhan tersebut merupakan satu pembohongan yang nyata yang dibuat dengan penuh kesedaran bahawa ianya satu pembohongan! Saya tidak tahu mengapa Hj Hadi kebelakangan ini kerap berbohong.

Sekiranya ianya dianggap bukan satu pembohongan oleh beliau dan beliau benar yakin akan kebenarannya maka ahli-ahli PAS haruslah berwaspada. Kerana ini bermakna bahawa beliau sudah mula mengalami satu keadaan yang tidak dapat membezakan di antara kebenaran dari khayalan. Situasi 'delusional' ini menyebabkan beliau sentiasa dalam keadaan cemas dan menganggap dirinya dan Islam dimusuhi oleh semua, kecuali oleh PAS dan UMNO.

Tuduhan ini sebenarnya bukanlah baharu maka yang dikatakan sebagai 'pendedahan' selepas 3 tahun ini adalah dakwaan …