Skip to main content

The ‘debate’ on Human Rights

Malaysia has many things which are unique. Its multiracial, multireligious and multilingual nature. Its flora and fauna. Its food. Its Parliament. The rest we can be proud of. Not the Parliament.

I dare say that it is the only Parliament in the world which when “debating” a Bill concerning human rights, the ruling party justifies and defends actions which are completely contrary to the spirit and understanding of human rights!

I would even venture to say that the BN MPs do not have the slightest inkling of what human rights are all about in the first place.

Let’s take it from the beginning though shall we. A Bill calling for the amendment of the original Suhakam Bill was tabled on March 24 morning and called for debate on March 25 morning. Hardly 24 hours’ notice. Almost an hour was used up by the PR MPs arguing against the way the Bill was being pushed through.

Not enough notice, not enough time to prepare, no time to do research and the such. The minister of course was unimpressed, replying it was only five (5) pages. In the process of the debate, Lim Kit Siang was sent out and banned from coming in until after 1pm.

When we finally started to debate the Bill, the arguments presented by the BN MPs were stupefying to say the least. They used the debate to justify the ISA, the banning of ceramahs and demonstrations and even the recent suspension of the permits for Harakah and Suara Keadilan!

Are we talking about the defence of human rights or the right to trample on human rights here? I doubt if the BN MPs know the difference.

The issue at hand was basic human rights. This means the rights which any human being, wherever and whatever he is, has a right to. The denial of these rights would constitute an act of injustice and suppression. The basic human rights include the right to life, honour, freedom, freedom of speech and expression, freedom of association, right to assemble, right to dissent and the rest.

None of these rights can be denied unless due to just cause such as having committed a crime for which one is proven guilty. Then one loses one’s right to freedom, for example, and can be put away for a period which depends on the nature and severity of the crime committed.

The infringement on human rights in Malaysia and at times its total and complete denial is justified by the BN MPs due to the uniqueness of Malaysian society. Its plurality, its diversity, its sensitivities.

As such, they claim, the practice of human rights must be in a manner which “we Malaysians” see as being suitable for our country and cannot be decided for us by international observers or according to some foreign international standard. The “we Malaysians” is of course to be read as “we BN”.

The ISA is justified as a necessary “preventive measure” to avoid political instability and chaos, while the suspension of the Harakah and Suara Keadilan permits are also necessary to avoid racial tensions and the “spread of lies”. Human rights are thus to be sacrificed for the “greater good”.

Again to be read as the “BN’s greater good”. The banning of demonstrations, would you believe it, is justified as necessary so as to prevent traffic jams and thus the denial of the public’s right to jam-free motoring!

Any objective evaluation of the arguments would conclude that there are other more transparent recourses for the government to take when faced with these situations. Trials in an open court of law can be used to prove grounds for preventive detention, newspapers can be sued for libel or for raising racial tensions.

However, these options deny absolute power and disgression to the executive and that is what they are unwilling to accept. By not allowing the system of check and balance to work, they only serve to guarantee that basic human rights, although guaranteed by the constitution, will be denied to the public.

After a short debate, hardly two hours, the minister is then called to respond to the issues raised in the debate. He does so very quickly, not allowing much interruptions or calls for clarifications and at the end explains that the Bill needs to be passed so that it can then be presented to the ICC (International Coordinating Committee) of the UN the next day!

The amendments were being made as a result of the comments received in August 2008 which noted various shortcomings in the original document. It gave little autonomy and limited transparency and as a result Malaysia’s grading may drop.

The suggested amendments were inserted and it is hoped, says the minister, that our grading would not be affected. That explains the bulldozing approach!

It took the BN minister close to a year to prepare a five-paged amendment and it was done not due to any realisation on their part of the shortcomings. As far as they were concerned, Malaysian human rights, according to Malaysian standards and realities, were OK. It was done merely to comply, at least outwardly.

If grades are determined by what is written on paper and not what is practised in real life, then we have a good chance of being upgraded. If, on the other hand, it is determined by what is practised, then as the quality of debate and nature of BN views expressed prove, we have a good chance of staying where we are or dropping further down the grading ladder!

Someone asked “what should we do?” My answer, “What any self-respecting Malaysian would. Join the movement for change. Spread the word. Distribute articles. Attend talk shows. Educate. Elucidate. Emulate. Gather family, friends and acquaintances. Register with the Election Commission as voters. Be ready for the next GE. Nothing can stop an informed and politically active society from achieving change for the better”.

WaLlahu 'Alam
*this article was originally published in The Malaysian Insider (03/04/2009)

Comments

UMNO interest is what matters when national interests are raised in Parliament. That's why Zaid resigned as he could not reform the Judiciary as UMNO was more interested in protecting party interests above Judiciary.
Every public insitution - EC, AG, Police, MACC, BTN, Kemas, GLCs, Parliament or you name it, exist to defend, protect and sustain UMNO interest.
I have been doing what you suggested for a couple of years now - getting the uninformed, the apolitical and the couldn't-care-less friends to register as voters.
Reform begins with voting. It is our vote which will dethrone UMNO. Let every single one of us here get another 10 or 20 (especially young adults) to register immediately.
Anonymous said…
Salam, YB Khalid.

Keep up the good work. Proud to have an MP like you, YB!

Popular posts from this blog

Berakhirnya Drama RUU 355?

Drama perlaksanaan sistem perundangan Islam yang mengambil bentuk usul persendirian YB Marang berhubung Akta 355 kelihatan menghampiri adegan penamatnya. Pada peringkat kesudahannya UMNO/BN kelihatan sebagai pihak yang meraih keuntungan terbesar dengan pembangkang berada dalam keadaan berpecah dan tidak bersepakat. Keutuhan Pakatan Rakyat yang telah mewarnai pilihan raya ke 13 pada 2013 sudah jelas hilang. Yang sepatutnya mengambil tempatnya, iaitu Pakatan Harapan, masih dalam keadaan sedikit terumbang-ambing, khususnya berhubung hubungan dengan PAS.

Tindakan UMNO/BN untuk mensasarkan PAS melalui isu perundangan Islam adalah satu ‘master-stroke’ yang tidak boleh dinafikan mana-mana pihak. Melaluinya bukan sahaja PR berpecah, namun ketidak-tentuan sikap terhadap PAS menyebabkan apa-apa tindakbalas untuk menyelamatkan keadaan menjadi tidak padu dan kurang bersungguh-sungguh. Kebergantungan terhadap PAS oleh pihak tertentu menyebabkan mereka tidak sanggup memutuskan hubungan dengan PAS s…

Kenyataan Media Amanah Mengenai RUU 355

Muqaddimah

Amanah menganggap mahkamah syariah sebagai institusi penting dalam usaha menzahirkan kebenaran dan keadilan Islam. Oleh itu imejnya sebagai institusi yang cekap dan berwibawa perlu sentiasa dijaga. Amanah bersetuju bahawa segala usaha ke arah memperkasakan mahkamah syariah, dari segi kecekapan perlaksanaan undang-undang Islam, perlu disokong dan dibantu.

Kenyataan Berhubung Usul Persendirian Marang: Cadangan Pindaan ke Atas Akta 355

MUQADDIMAH

1. AMANAH ingin menegaskan bahawa Mahkamah Syariah adalah institusi keadilan Islam dan oleh itu apa jua usaha ke arah menperkasakannya adalah disokong. Bidang kuasanya berhubung kesalahan jenayah syariah dijelaskan dalam Akta 355 sediada. Akta 355 ini perlu dijaga dengan baik dan apa jua usaha pembaik-pulihan serta pindaan terhadapnya perlu diperhalusi secara teliti supaya tidak menjejas kedudukan mahkamah syariah.

2. Akta 355 sediada telah digubal mengambil kira kedudukan dan peranan Mahkamah Syariah di dalam kerangka struktur kenegaraan Malaysia yang di dalamnya wujud Mahkamah Sivil dan juga Mahkamah Syariah. Sepertimana diketahui umum, bidang kuasa Mahkamah Syariah adalah terhad kepada orang Islam dan kesalahan-kesalahan tertentu seperti terkandung dalam Senarai II Senarai Negeri Jadual kesembilan Perlembagaan Persekutuan. Selainnya adalah di bawah Mahkamah Sivil.

3. Apa jua pindaan yang ingin dibawa semestinya selari dengan kedudukan dan peranan ini supaya tidak berlaku…