Skip to main content

Justice For All

I wish to respond to a remark posted by anaklangkawi in relation to my article ‘Tuan Guru Haji Hadi’s comments on HINDRAF’s Raya visit’. The remark is as follows:-
“Its funny to see how PAS people react nowadays compared to how they act in the old days.

Sorry YB. As for Hindraf. Its a pertubuhan haram. I dont agree with such movement who 'fitnah the government'. Fitnah all the malays & people. Etnic clansing etc2.

P/s: Still remember what the petition says..”
First and foremost, I wish to refer to the petition. The petition causes me to reflect on what the Indian community has been told all this while by the MIC. In the BN set-up, the MIC acts as the bridge between the Indians and the other communities, including the Malays. UMNO on the other hand acts as the bridge between the Malays and the other communities. What thus happens is that there is limited inter-action, in respect to political issues, between the races and the aspiration of the other races is not known first hand by another race. They are informed of the political aspiration of the other races by their respective race based party.

What this means is that the MIC tells the Indians what the Malays want. When there are problems faced by the Indians, MIC explains it to the Indian community why the problem occurs. It is logical to assume that the petition as presented is the conclusion made by members of the Indian community as to the reasons why the estate Indians and the problem faced by their temples are not handled effectively by the BN. The conclusion is made based on the clarifications by the MIC leadership.

It is logical also to assume that the MIC uses the Malays as the reason for the plight of the estate Indians and the problems faced by their temples. They probably also inform the Indians that Islam prevents the construction of their temples and the message of fear and hate, told such that the Indians are increasing convinced of the need to support MIC, goes on and on.

Similar is the case with the Malays. While UMNO shares the same bed with MCA, Gerakan, MIC and the rest of the BN, behind their backs, they tell the Malays of the insincerity of the Chinese, the rebelliousness of the Indians and the oppurtunism of the Sabahans and the Sarawakians. It is this same message of fear and hate which they hope will keep the Malays under their influence.

Since the release of the petition and the growth of influence of PR, HINDRAF has come into direct contact with PKR, DAP and also PAS. They were informed of the deception of the MIC and have seen the new vision of national unity which PR seeks to realize, based on ‘Justice for all’. They are informed of the justice of Islam as adhered to by PAS and the fact that the Buddhists, Hindus and other religious denominations have had no problems with the PAS government in Kelantan. Based on these revelations, their leaders have re-directed their anger not to the Malays and the Muslims, but to UMNO and the MIC itself!

They have retracted the use of the term ‘ethnic cleansing’ in the ceramahs before the general elections but this has been played down by the government controlled media. UMNO/BN wants to maintain racial sensitivities at a raised level. They see racial sensitivities as their savior and could not care less about the damage it does to the social fabric of this Nation.

The fact that HINDRAF is not registered is NOT a major problem if the UMNO/BN is interested in addressing the problems raised by them for the sake of the Indian community. ‘BERSIH’ similarly is not a registered body and the accurate and substantiated critiques of the election process submitted by BERSIH are irresponsibly brushed aside by the BN.

One must be acutely aware of the strategy of racial sentiment currently pursued by UMNO in particular. Suddenly the parties representing the Chinese in the BN are vocal in demanding concessions. The Indians who support HINDRAF are potrayed as ‘chipping away’ at the bastion of ‘ketuanan Melayu’. The UMNO strategy is to portray the PR as a government incapable and unwilling to defend the Malays and Islam from the onslaught of the other races. Nothing could be further from the truth. Both the Malays in PKR and the Muslims in PAS wish to save the Malay Muslims from the disgrace brought upon them by the policies of UMNO. These policies UMNO seeks to defend, at great cost and damage to Islam’s image, as policies made necessary for the sake of Islam. Such arguments only damages Islam and the Malays and if we wish to earn the respect of all, in this Nation called Malaysia, and with that maintain our position at its helm, as is necessitated by our majority status, then we must come up with a new image and a new, more just vision to be shared by all.

This is what PAS seeks to do. Portray the message of ‘justice for all’ as brought by Islam. This message and mission can be pursued without sacrificing the principles of the federal constitution.

WalLahu 'Alam

Comments

Unknown said…
YB,

Thank You so much for the excellent perspective on the pernicious nature of racial politics in our beloved country.

I only wish there were more MPs like your good self to make this nation a beacon of justice for all.

Best Wishes
Jaya

Popular posts from this blog

Keadilan Saidina Umar Al-Khattab Terhadap Rumah Ibadah Agama Lain

Saya ingin mengambil kesempatan ini untuk mengemukakan sebuah kisah dari zaman pemerintahan Saidina Umar Al-Khattab (r.a) untuk tatapan dan renungan tuan-tuan sekalian. Melalui pendedahan ini, adalah diharap sebahagian dari ummat Islam yang tidak memahami konsep keadilan Islam terhadap agama lain, akan sedikit sebanyak dapat memikirkan kembali sikap dan pendirian mereka itu. Kisah yang ingin dikemukakan adalah kisah Saidina Umar dan Kanisah (gereja) Al-Qiamah yang terletak di Quds. Kisah ini adalah petikan dari muka surat 114, kitab Itmam al-Wafa’ fi sirah al-Khulafa’ , tulisan as-Syeikh Muhammad bin al-Afifi al-Banjuri, Darul Ibnu Hazim. “Dan apabila masuknya Saidina Umar ke dalam kota, maka masuklah beliau ke dalam Kanisah (gereja) al-Qiamah, dan beliau duduk di ruang utama gereja tersebut . Setelah tiba waktu solat asar, maka berkata Saidina Umar kepada Patriach Kanisah tersebut, “Saya ingin mengerjakan solat.” Jawab Patriach: “Solat sahajalah di sini”. Tetapi Umar menolak cadan

Surat Terbuka Untuk Penduduk Seksyen 23

2hb September 2009 M 13 Ramadan 1430 H السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته Kehadapan penduduk Seksyen 23 yang dihormati, Semoga surat ini menemui tuan-tuan dalam keadaan sihat wal afiat serta keimanan yang teguh dan jitu berkat bulan Ramadhan ini. Saya mengambil kesempatan ini untuk mengingatkan diri saya serta tuan-tuan akan Firman Allah, Surah Al Maaidah ayat 8 yang bermaksud; “Bertindak adil! Ianya lebih rapat dengan keTaqwaan.” Semoga dalam usaha kita membina keTaqwaan dalam bulan Ramadhan ini, kita mengingati hakikat bahawa ‘keTaqwaan’ yang diusahakan itu mempunyai hubungan rapat dengan keadilan. Keadilan ini pula perlu dilaksanakan terhadap semua, walaupun terhadap yang tidak disenangi. Ini ditegaskan di dalam ayat yang sama yang bermaksud, “dan jangan oleh kerana kebencian kamu terhadap sesuatu kaum menyebabkan kamu tidak berlaku adil…” Kalau terhadap kaum yang dibenci sekalipun dituntut keadilan, apatah lagi terhadap jiran sekampung dan warga sekota? Walaupun mereka tidak seba

Peta Lokasi Berhubung Kuil Seksyen 19

Memandangkan persoalan kuil Seksyen 19 yang ingin dipindahkan telah menjadi isu Nasional, saya sertakan di sini peta-peta yang menunjukkan kedudukan lokasi-lokasi yang relevan berhubung persoalan ini. Oleh yang demikian, tuan-tuan boleh menilai sendiri samada tapak cadangan di Seksyen 23 adalah wajar atau sebaliknya. [PETA 1 - Seksyen 19,20,22 dan 23] Peta pertama menunjukkan kedudukan Seksyen 19, 20, 22 dan 23 serta kedudukan kuil di Seksyen 19, tapak cadangankan asal oleh BN di Seksyen 22 dan tapak yang dicadangkan di Seksyen 23. Harap diberi perhatian bahawa Seksyen 22 merupakan kawasan Industri berat (berwarna gelap) tanpa adanya rumah berhampiran sepertimana peta yang kedua. Dakwaan Seksyen 22 adalah kawasan majoriti masyarakat India adalah dakwaan palsu. [PETA 2 - Seksyen 22] Peta ketiga menunjukkan ‘close-up’ Seksyen 19 dan bagaimana Kuil berkenaan dikelilingi rumah. Jarak di antara rumah terdekat dan Kuil adalah lebih kurang 20 kaki iaitu selebar jalan. [PETA 3 - Seksyen