Skip to main content

An Effective Opposition

Someone commented that the PR are too busy ‘bragging’ about taking over the Federal Government that it has forgotten its responsibility of being an effective opposition. Well, I really do not know the yard-stick which he or she uses but given the circumstances I think we have performed considerably well. So well in fact that the Parliament is nowadays attended by many interested parties who wish to witness the debates brought on by the Opposition, i.e. PR.

Perhaps the ‘someone’ concerned isn’t fully aware of what has been happening and I wish to use this opportunity to enlighten everyone of what has been done in the Parliament all this while. What we have done and achieved in the PR states I will not go into here as the issue is ‘an effective opposition’ presumably in Parliament.

During the first Parliamentary session held from the 28th of April up to the 29th of May, the main order of meeting was the King’s inaugural speech. The issues raised by the Opposition following the speech saw the session extended by two days. The session ended on the 29th of May instead of the originally intended date of the 27th of May. Many issues were raised including the undemocratic nature of the last elections, which included the last minute cancellation of the use of indelible ink. The ink had, according to the government, already been bought for RM 2 Million but not used due to ‘security concerns’. Similarly many issues on the wastages in government spending, the pandemic nature of corruption in the administration as well as contracts which were very one sided in favor of the favored contractors were raised and effectively argued against. This led to some of the BN MPs promising to study the issues raised, including the negotiation with various concession holders for lower rates. The issue of Altantuya was also raised as her father watched from the gallery.

The second session was from the 23rd of June to the 17th of July. This session started with a bill by a Minister (my brother Shahrir) seeking support for the drastic rise in petrol prices decided on by the government. You can watch the debate pertaining to this issue in two parts; Part1 and Part2. The price hike was implemented when Parliament was not in session on the 6th of June. No discussion was held and after almost two weeks our agreement sought. The PR MPs put up a defiant stand against the said government decision and the debate was long and exhaustive. Nonetheless the government stubbornly stood their ground.

The following days focused on supplementary budgets which needed endorsement from the Parliament although the expenses had already been incurred. Such is the nature of Malaysian democracy! The Parliament is made into a huge rubber stamp as the expenses have been incurred before discussing it in the Parliament. Nonetheless, again the PR parliamentarians performed well, and we were complimented on our performance many times. The post of the AG was also debated in this session as to how he is to be made more accountable to the Public. We know of reports from the ACA which were not acted upon simply due to the practice of ‘selective prosecution’. One must understand that only the AG has the right to prosecute on behalf of the people. A few regulations were also deliberated on.

The third session started on the 18th of August and is currently in recess due to the Holy month of Ramadhan. The most heated debate during this session was on the DNA bill which we believe targets Anwar. Although it targets Anwar, the passing of the bill has serious consequences to all Malaysians as it gives such sweeping powers to the police. It leaves a suspect completely defenseless and would make the ‘set up’ of an intended victim very easy. We opposed the bill but again the BN representatives, even after some voiced agreement with our arguments, voted in favor of it. It was therefore passed.

So, based on the above somewhat lengthy disclosure, I do not agree with the statement that the PR is not an effective opposition. Given the way ‘democracy’ is being practiced here and the ‘enbloc’ voting demanded by the BN, irrespective of the views of the individual MP, can any opposition really be effective? They will forever bull doze anything and everything they wish even if it is clear that there are strong arguments against it.

Wallahu ‘Alam

Comments

joe said…
Salam YB,

Never give up...fight till the end,
bak kata pepatah "Janganlah berputus asa. Tetapi kalau anda sampai berada dalam keadaan putus asa, berjuanglah terus meskipun dalam keadaan putus
asa."

carcoon

Popular posts from this blog

Berakhirnya Drama RUU 355?

Drama perlaksanaan sistem perundangan Islam yang mengambil bentuk usul persendirian YB Marang berhubung Akta 355 kelihatan menghampiri adegan penamatnya. Pada peringkat kesudahannya UMNO/BN kelihatan sebagai pihak yang meraih keuntungan terbesar dengan pembangkang berada dalam keadaan berpecah dan tidak bersepakat. Keutuhan Pakatan Rakyat yang telah mewarnai pilihan raya ke 13 pada 2013 sudah jelas hilang. Yang sepatutnya mengambil tempatnya, iaitu Pakatan Harapan, masih dalam keadaan sedikit terumbang-ambing, khususnya berhubung hubungan dengan PAS.

Tindakan UMNO/BN untuk mensasarkan PAS melalui isu perundangan Islam adalah satu ‘master-stroke’ yang tidak boleh dinafikan mana-mana pihak. Melaluinya bukan sahaja PR berpecah, namun ketidak-tentuan sikap terhadap PAS menyebabkan apa-apa tindakbalas untuk menyelamatkan keadaan menjadi tidak padu dan kurang bersungguh-sungguh. Kebergantungan terhadap PAS oleh pihak tertentu menyebabkan mereka tidak sanggup memutuskan hubungan dengan PAS s…

Kapal Perang Tariq Ibn Ziyad dan Isu Bai’ah Taklik – Kata Penutup

Pada 8 Ramadhan tahun ke-92 Hijrah, tentera-tentera Islam di bawah pimpinan Tariq Ibn Ziyad telah mendarat di bumi Sepanyol selepas merentasi lautan Mediterranean. Sebaik sahaja mendarat, Tariq mengarahkan supaya kapal-kapal tentera Islam ini dibakar. Beliau melakukan ini dengan tujuan supaya tentera-tenteranya menyedari bahawa mereka tiada pilihan lain selain dari meneruskan perjuangan, samada gugur atau mencapai kemenangan.

Bagi yang tidak faham, tindakan Tariq Ibn Ziyad merupakan tindakan yang tidak bertanggung jawab, mencampakkan nyawa tentera-tenteranya dalam bahaya, kejam dan zalim! Bagi yang tidak berilmu, mereka akan pantas menyatakan tindakan itu adalah haram kerana cuba membunuh diri!

Dari sudut strategi peperangan ianya menzahirkan satu tekad yang teramat tinggi agar berjuang berhabis-habisan agar mencapai kemenangan. Tindakan membakar kapal-kapal ini adalah bertujuan untuk menghalang tentera Islam dari memikirkan pilihan untuk berpatah balik, berundur dan lari dari pertempur…

Penjelasan atas Fitnah yang Disebar Kononnya Ahli Parlimen Shah Alam, YBKS 'Sembah Ayam'

1. PAS untuk sekian kali sudah bertukar menjadi parti fitnah dan maki hamun. Tiada selain memunafikkan, mengkafirkan atau dituduhnya syirik kepada orang lain termasuklah dalam gambar saat akhir video CNY yang dibuat DAP.



2. Perlu faham bahawa mengikut bahasa Cina, perkataan Na (itu) Ji (Ayam) yang kebetulan bunyinya sama macam Najib.

3. Video tersebut adalah berkaitan Kisah Ayam itu (Na Ji) yang jahat dan selalu merugikan tuannya.

4. Tuannya serah ayam itu kepada YB Teresa kerana sudah tidak mampu lagi membela ayam itu. Tiba-tiba semasa menerima ayam itu, ia terlepas lari, mereka semua mengejarnya dan berjaya ditangkapnya semula.

5. YBKS telah memasukkan ayam itu (na ji) dalam sangkar (penjara) dan ucap Selamat Tahun Baharu Cina.

6. Photo terakhir itu menunjukkan mereka semua mengucapkan Selamat Tahun Baru Cina pada Na Ji yang sudah berada dlm sangkar (penjara).


7. Tiada upacara atau scene sembahan di situ. Gong Xi Faa Chai yang disebut bukanlah penyembahan.

Seronokkah buat dan se…